Info Center
VR

What Are The Different Options For Packaging Printing?

November 25, 2024

Packaging is more than just a protective shell for a product. It's a key element of branding and communication, where design meets functionality. Packaging, within our competitive market, is more than just protection and presentation of items; it can tell a story, present sustainability, and make a lasting impact. However, what many do not realize is the impact printing method can have on packaging. It could either make or break your product, helping you achieve your marketing goals goals.  

 

There are numerous printing options that brands can use, whether it's choosing custom packaging designs or using sustainable packaging practices. But, you may be wondering: "How many choices are there for packaging printing?" This article is here to answer this question, by breaking down the major printing methods and explaining what makes each unique.


packaging printing


Custom Packaging: Presenting Your Brand’s Identity

Personalization is probably one of the first things you have to consider when choosing packaging. Custom packaging allows you to create unique designs that match your brand's image. The printing method you choose can make or break your campaign, whether you are a small business trying to get noticed or a large corporation wanting to reaffirm consistency in branding.

 

Custom packaging offers businesses the opportunity to display a logo, colors, typography and other design elements that represent its branding. In industries like retail, food and cosmetics, for example, where product presentation can mean the difference between a purchase or not, this is key.

 

However, deciding how to print on custom packaging isn't straightforward. The technique used can affect not only how the final product looks but also its cost and environmental impact. Let’s talk about some of the most popular printing options used today.


Offset Lithography: The Traditional Choice

One of the most common methods of printing on packaging is offset lithography, more commonly known as offset printing. This technique transfers images onto paper or cardboard with ink and metal plates. It is well known for producing high quality, sharp images and is particularly well suited for larger production runs.

Pros of Offset Lithography:

High-Quality Prints: It delivers clean, sharp images with vibrant colors.

Economical for Large Runs: Offset printing is more economical if you print more units, and therefore is preferable for high volume packaging requirements.

Consistency: Once the plates are created, each print will be identical, which is crucial for maintaining brand consistency.


Cons of Offset Lithography:

High Setup Costs: It is costly to set up plates making it less practical for small quantities or frequent design changes.

Time-Consuming: Since the setup time in needed, it may result in slower turnaround time than other printing methods.

 

Offset lithography remains an industry standard for businesses that need consistent, high volume packaging such as food and beverage companies. While this definitely may be a viable option for some designers, it may not be the best possible solution for companies who simply want small scale custom packaging solutions.


Flexography: Efficiency for Versatility

Flexo or Flexography is a popular method of printing for packaging. Best suited to print on various of materials: cardboard, plastics or metallic films. Flexo printing uses a flexible relief plate making it quicker and flexible method to print on different surfaces.

Pros of Flexography:

High-Speed Production: Flexography is often quicker than most other printing methods, therefore making it suitable for high volume production.

Wide Range of Materials: It prints on almost any type of packaging material, from corrugated cardboard to plastic film.

Cost-Effective for Large Runs: Flexo is similar to offset; the more units you print, the more economical the process becomes.


Cons of Flexography:

Lower Print Quality for Detailed Designs: Flexo is great for most simple designs and large areas of color, but it will struggle with fine details and high resolution images.

Initial Setup Costs: Flexography also needs plate setup, which can be an expensive process.

 

Flexography is widely used in industries that require large volumes of packaging, such as shipping, consumer goods, and grocery products. Additionally, it is widely utilized on flexible products like plastic bags or shrink wraps, making it also the go to for variable packaging.


Digital Printing: The Future of Customization

Digital printing is a newcomer to the packaging world, but it is rapidly becoming popular, particularly in the custom packaging business. Digital printing doesn’t use plates so designs can be printed directly onto packaging materials using inkjet or laser printers.

Pros of Digital Printing:

No Setup Costs:  Digital printing is cost effective when no plates are needed, for smaller runs, or when design changes are frequent.

Fast Turnaround: Digital printing does not have a setup phase, making it faster, and therefore better for the brands which need a quick solution for packaging.

Highly Customizable: This is particularly well suited to personalized packaging or limited edition runs.


Cons of Digital Printing:

Higher Cost Per Unit for Large Runs: Offset or flexo are more cost effective for large scale production.

Lower Durability: Digitally printed packaging provides excellent visual quality, but possibly at the expense of durability or wear resistance compared to packaging produced using traditional methods.

 

Digital printing is a good solution for small businesses and startup companies specializing in niche markets or constantly changing product lines.


Gravure Printing: Precision for Premium Packaging

Gravure printing is a high-quality printing method often used for luxury packaging. The images are etched onto a cylinder, then that cylinder is used to apply ink onto the packaging material. This method is extremely precise and can create very detailed and vibrant images.

Pros of Gravure Printing:

High-Quality Prints: Gravure is one of the best in terms of print quality, particularly on intricate designs.

Durability: Gravure printing is best for premium packaging that require longevity because the images aren’t prone to fading.

Speed for Large Runs: Once the cylinders are made, gravure printing is high speed and efficient for mass production.


Cons of Gravure Printing:

High Setup Costs: The etched cylinders are expensive and take a long time to make, which makes it impractical for smaller orders.

Limited Material Range: Gravure is mainly used for more upscale paper and plastic packaging, with limited application.

 

Gravure printing is often used for industries like cosmetics and high end retail, where  premium, visually striking packaging is required.


Sustainable Packaging: A Growing Priority

Today, more brands are turning to sustainable packaging solutions. As consumer demand for eco friendly products rise, companies start embracing these techniques to minimize their impact in the environment.


How Printing Methods Impact Sustainability:


Eco-Friendly Inks:

The non-toxic water based inks used with digital printing are less harmful to the environment than other printing methods. These sustainable inks can also be used in flexography and offset printing.


Reducing Waste:

Digital printing produces less waste compared to traditional methods, which often involve discarded plates and excess ink.


Sustainable Packaging Materials:

Some printing methods are more suited to eco friendly materials like recycled paper or biodegradable plastics. For example, flexography is highly compatible with sustainable packaging materials.

 

Companies can combine sustainable packaging materials with environmentally friendly printing techniques to create packaging that appeals with its looks while being in line with a company’s sustainability goals.


Hybrid Printing: Combining the Best of Both Worlds

In some cases, multiple packaging printing techniques may be necessary. Hybrid printing involves combining digital printing with flexography or offset lithography. Using this approach, brands can harness the powers of various printing methods while tackling their limitations, both at the same time.

 

For instance, if a brand needs to print individualized design, or barcodes for a mass distribution campaign, digital printing comes to the rescue. While if a brand simply wants a high quality picture, offset printing is the preferred choice. For brands looking to achieve both customization and efficiencies at large scale, hybrid printing stands out as a flexible offering.


Conclusion:

There is no one-size-fits-all solution to packaging printing. Similarly, there’s no ‘best’ method as it depends on things like the size of the production run, material type, and how much customisation is required. Today, customization and sustainability have become the key to delivering quality packaging that resonates with consumers, and choosing the right print method plays a big role in that.


FAQs

What is the most cost-effective printing method for large packaging runs?

Offset lithography and flexography are usually the least expensive processes for large production run, both in total production cost and cost of each unit.

 

Is digital printing suitable for sustainable packaging?

Yes, digital printing can involve eco friendly inks and result in less waste, so it is a great choice for eco friendly packaging.

 

Can I print on eco-friendly materials using traditional printing methods?

Yes, recycled and biodegradable materials can actually be adapted in many traditional methods such as flexography and offset lithography.


Basic Information
  • Year Established
    --
  • Business Type
    --
  • Country / Region
    --
  • Main Industry
    --
  • Main Products
    --
  • Enterprise Legal Person
    --
  • Total Employees
    --
  • Annual Output Value
    --
  • Export Market
    --
  • Cooperated Customers
    --
Chat
Now

Send your inquiry

Choose a different language
English
Türkçe
ภาษาไทย
Ελληνικά
русский
Português
한국어
日本語
italiano
français
Español
Deutsch
العربية
svenska
norsk
Nederlands
Bahasa Melayu
bahasa Indonesia
dansk
български
Қазақ Тілі
Suomi
Current language:English